Scoring rules for judgment aggregation

نویسنده

  • Franz Dietrich
چکیده

This paper introduces a new class of judgment aggregation rules, to be called ‘scoring rules’ after their famous counterparts in preference aggregation theory. A scoring rule generates the collective judgment set which reaches the highest total ‘score’across the individuals, subject to the judgment set having to be rational. Depending on how we de…ne ‘scores’, we obtain several (old and new) solutions to the judgment aggregation problem, such as distance-based aggregation, premiseand conclusion-based aggregation, truth-tracking rules, and a generalization of the Borda rule to judgment aggregation theory. Scoring rules are shown to generalize the classical scoring rules of preference aggregation theory. JEL Classi…cation: D70, D71

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Complexity Results for Aggregating Judgments using Scoring or Distance-Based Procedures

Judgment aggregation is an abstract framework for studying collective decision making by aggregating individual opinions on logically related issues. Important types of judgment aggregation methods are those of scoring and distance-based methods, many of which can be seen as generalisations of voting rules. An important question to investigate for judgment aggregation methods is how hard it is ...

متن کامل

A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties

The literature on judgment aggregation has now been moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we focus on a family of rules that is the natural counterpart of the family of Condorcetconsistent voting rules: majority-preserving judgment aggregation rules. A judgment aggregation rule is majority-preserving if ...

متن کامل

Acceptance, Aggregation and Scoring Rules

This article provides a novel perspective on the vexed issue of the relation between probability and rational acceptability, exploiting a recently-noted structural parallel with the problem of judgment aggregation. After offering a number of general desiderata on the relation between finite probability models and sets of accepted sentences in a Boolean sentential language, it is noted that a nu...

متن کامل

Distance-Based Judgment Aggregation of Three-Valued Judgments with Weights

Judgment aggregation theory studies how to amalgamate individual opinions on a set of logically related issues into a set of collective opinions. Aggregation rules proposed in the literature are sparse. All proposed rules consider only two-valued judgments, thus imposing the strong requirement that an agent cannot abstain from giving judgments on any of the issues. All proposed rules are also i...

متن کامل

Distance-based rules for weighted judgment aggregation

Cooperating agents need to reach group decisions on several logically related issues. These decision-making problems are studied in social choice theory by the discipline of judgment aggregation. Judgment aggregation produces group decisions by aggregating individual answers to binary questions, however existing aggregation rules are defined for a very restricted setting, insufficient for aggre...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social Choice and Welfare

دوره 42  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014